TRUMP PROVES HE'S ROTHSCHILD AGENT - commits evil, unjustified, illegal acts of war.
By
comments and news from net, Posted in Conspiracies / Conspiracy Theories
Worldwide clear thinking people - are outraged & angered by Trump's unjustified acts of war upon Syria. And most especially since the supposed GAS ATTACK incident DID NOT REALLY HAPPEN, it has been proven to be another another NWO staged psyop hoax. The Trump missiles hitting Syria are nothing but baldfaced war aggression, illegally taken and without any cogent foundation of cause. It is an impeachable transgression which only the misinformed, reactive and emotionally shallow will support. This incident is equal to or worse than the 1964 Gulf of Tonkin Lie and Richard Nixon's 1970 illegal invasions of Cambodia and Laos, for it reopens the wounds and prolongs the chaos of an horrific war that was just about concluded. These missiles launched are heinous and evil acts certainly done at the behest of and in collusion with the NWO-Zio Rothschild Cartel. rump is thus sadly umasked as an agent for them.
======
HERE IS COURAGEOUS COMMENTARY ON THE MATTER BY SENATOR RAND PAUL:
In foreign policy, things are not as simple as they appear, and actions often have consequences well beyond the obvious.
It is for this very reason that the Founders wanted a deliberate, thoughtful foreign policy, and when military action was needed, they wanted it debated and authorized by Congress.
Make no mistake, no matter who is president or what their party is, it is my firm belief that the president needs congressional authorization for military action, as required by the Constitution. I call on this president to come to Congress for a proper debate over our role in Syria, just as I did in 2013 when President Obama contemplated acting in Syria.
I believe that nothing about this situation has changed. Military action is not in our national security interest and should not be authorized. Our prior interventions in this region have done nothing to make us safer, and Syria will be no different.
...Assad is fighting radical Islamic rebels, including large parts of ISIS. Who would take over Syria if Assad is deposed? Experience in Libya tells us chaos could reign, and radical Islamists could control large parts of the country.
Make no mistake, bombing Assad means the United States is fighting on the same side as ISIS and other radical Islamists in Syria. This is a dangerous and morally wrong policy.
But no matter your view of the merits of engaging in Syria, every member of Congress should stand up today and reclaim our Constitutional authority over war.
The Constitution clearly states that it is Congress that has the power to declare war, not the president. Even the War Powers Resolution, shoved forward by hawks as justification, clearly states criteria under which the president may act - a declaration of war, a specific statutory authorization, or a national emergency created by an attack on the United States.
That's it. Absent those criteria, the president has no authority to act without congressional authorization. Congress must stand up and assert its authority here and now.
No president is above the law or the Constitution. I said so when it was Barack Obama, and I will say so when it is Donald Trump.
Our Founding Fathers had this right, and we should heed their wisdom about allowing the president to have war powers. They were concerned the president could rule like a king.
Madison wrote that the Constitution supposes what history demonstrates - that the executive is the branch most interested in war and most prone to it. The Constitution, therefore, with studied care, vested that power in the legislature.
In Syria - what is our goal? What happens if we depose Assad? Will the Islamist rebels, as they have threatened, turn their weapons and attention elsewhere,?
I will hold accountable and oppose the actions of any president who takes military action without proper legal authority and congressional consent.