ZioCon controlled Trump wants to give the NWO ZioCons what they want, more war... Starting to wish Jesse Ventura had run for Prez?
By
comments and news VIDEO from net, Posted in Politics / World
http://www.blacklistednews.com/Soft_coup_success%3F_Wall_Street_and_military-industrial_complex_run_US_Presidency/60476/0/38/38/Y/M.html
https://www.rt.com/usa/400458-trump-afghanistan-announcement-troops-strategy/
Trump says USA weary of wars without victory. That's incorrect. Victory or no. The USA -- is sick to our stomachs WEARY OF WAR, period. How is that not obvious to him?
begin at 5:40 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4oqtd2H0kCo
MICHAEL SAVAGE: - Author, historian, talk host MICHAEL SAVAGE on radio Tuesday declares... Trump has been taken over by a "soft military coup", the war mongering generals have taken over the Trump White House. Declares the AFGH SURGE a betrayal of campaign platform and campaign promises. Savage says "This is what a soft military coup looks like. Not a violent one like in Castro/Cuba... but a staged, insidious, political coup in the halls of government". First get rid of MAGA staff and advisors, then twist the POTUS toward the NWO Globalist ZioCon war-machine agenda.
RAND PAUL: - http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/rand-paul-trumps-reported-plans-to-send-more-troops-to-afghanistan-a-terrible-idea/article/2632172
LAURA INGRAHAM: - http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/laura-ingraham-questions-donald-trump-afghanistan/2017/08/22/id/809050/
TYT's blistering criticism (--sadly this severe critique, is quite correct) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pW7IGxpkiHA
[Its seeming more and more every day, the CFR-controlled TRUMP PRESIDENCY PSYOP is just to sow social-political discord, and usher in NWO-uber-cuck lackey PENCE- into the oval office chair.]
TRUMP IS NO LONGER JUST AN ASS KISSER OF THE HEINOUS CFR-Zio PUPPET MASTERS and AN HONORARY JEW.... HE'S NOW FULL FLEDGED 1000% ZIONIST. The AFHG "surge" is a go!
From the NYT:
*** WASHINGTON - President Trump's skepticism about America's involvement in Afghanistan was no secret to his staff. But his top national security officials were still taken aback at a meeting in the Situation Room on July 19, when an angry Mr. Trump began ripping apart their latest proposal to send thousands of additional American troops to the country "We're losing," the president declared, according to a person who was in the room. The plan, he complained, was vague and open-ended, with no definition of victory. "What does success look like?" he asked. NEVERTHELESS HE'S APPROVED A SURGE.
His journey to the decision for more war was starkly different than that of his predecessor, President Barack Obama. Unlike Mr. Obama, who ran for office promising to turn around the war in Afghanistan, Mr. Trump scarcely mentioned it on the campaign trail. But he had long opposed the war, in keeping with his general aversion to American military entanglements. As a private citizen, he repeatedly called on Mr. Obama to withdraw the troops. "It is time to get out of Afghanistan," Mr. Trump wrote on Twitter on Feb. 27, 2012, a period when he was beginning to think about running for president. "We are building roads and schools for people that hate us. It is not in our national interest."
Yet on Monday night, Mr. Trump put forward a plainly stupid decision about Afghanistan, one that would require thousands more American troops but place more conditions on the Afghan government. His decision, several officials said, was less a change of heart than a weary acceptance of the advocacy, made during three months of intense White House debate.
In the end, Trump supposedly accepted the idea that a "big military" approach was needed to prevent Afghanistan from again becoming a launching pad for terrorism against the United States. ***
=========
DTRI Editor's comment....
It's time to tag the NYT with a variation of a famous axiom, and start saying....
"THE NEW YORK TIMES IS A GRAD OLD LEGACY......... IF ONLY IT WERE TRUE!"
The entire NYT copy above is so hinged on a fake misleading lie, you just can't call the NYT journalism. Anyone at a huge newspaper like that WHO STILL DOES NOT KNOW, Afghanistan had NOTHING to do with 9/11... should be fired.
The US military involvement in Afghanistan has nothing to do with terrorism and never did. The war was planned for and readied for go-- BEFORE 9/11, and no one involved in the 9/11 terror attack planning came for Afghanistan, the 9/11 attacks were a Mossad/CIA production, a false flag evil, staged as a so called INSIDE JOB. It was controlled demolitions set up from within the USA, not attacks by foreign hijackers.
Also it should be noted, the TALIBAN is controlled and funded by the Rothschild Cartel. No SURGE is necessary to overcome the TALIBAN in AFGH. Their length of tenure in AFGH is determined by the same boss Trump has... THE NWO.
ARCHIVES from MAY 2017:
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/05/06/trump-wants-a-new-afghan-surge-thats-a-terrible-idea-215107