Guess how many hours gov't agents spent examining DNC servers to "prove" Russians "hacked". Exactly--- ZERO. They never did an investigation of DNC servers. At all. Ever. Never even looked at 'em. So how do they claim to KNOW who did what? A little birdie told them?
By
comments and news from net, Posted in Politics / World
For the DEMS who are mystified that Conservatives disbelieve RUSSIA HACKED... there's a simple answer to this mystery. THE GOVERNMENT HAS NO government investigation data to PROVE Russians hacked. NOTHING. Its just a wild claim that wasn't even investigated by any BY ANY federal agency. The gov't has offered NO INVESTIGATION EVIDENCE of work they've done to PROVE this wild claim. NOTHING. SO, mystery on the DISBELIEF thing solved now?
REWIND FOR PURPOSE OF LAUGHTER AND COMEDY.... Remember this news story BEFORE the Trump inauguration?
||||||||||||||||
"Wow." That's a former CIA director's reaction to President-elect Trump's refusal to believe that alleged Russian 'hackers' influenced the American election.
[And why is that weird since there's NO EVIDENCE OF IT?]
President Obama this ordered U.S. intelligence agencies to produce a "full review" into claims of Russian hacking, including intelligence officials' conclusions that Russian hackers stole electronic communications of Democrats in an attempt "to interfere with the U.S. election."
[Actually people the fact is this CLAIM is totally bogus since the FBI never even examined the DNC servers and no government agency did. So its like the little boy who lived down the lane telling you about world politics. Its absurd. And a worse lunacy to -believe- such wild unfounded claims]
On Wednesday, Time Magazine quoted Trump saying: "I don't believe they interfered... it could be Russia. And it could be China. And it could be some guy in his home in New Jersey."
[Completely correct statement]
Retired General Michael Hayden talked about Trump's refusal accept the intelligence agencies' claims, Wednesday evening: "To have the president-elect of the United States simply reject the fact-based narrative that the intelligence community puts together because it conflicts with his a priori assumptions. Wow," he said.
[FACT BASED NARRATIVE? What facts? NO FACTS HAVE BEEN PRESENTED THAT ARE legally assertable "evidence"]
"The data matters," Hayden said. "He continues to reject the Russians did it... and claims that it was politicized intelligence."
[Yes very correct, and yes the data matters but the government does not HAVE any data because they never EXAMINED the DNC servers. Did you hear that dear pubic. THE GOVERNMENT IS LYING. What a surprise, eh?]
Hayden pointed out that the current director of national intelligence, James Clapper, cited "high confidence" when he blamed Russia for the hacks. That level of certainty is rare, Hayden said.
[James Clapper has admitted he LIES to congress under oath]
Hayden was director of the U.S. National Security Agency during the lead-up to the Iraq War. He later served as head of the CIA.
[And what a great a job Hayden did, LYING us into the Iraq War. Thanks again Hayden, you're an unconscionable liar and war criminal. Congrats!]